ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating health literacy and pandemic concerns in saudi healthcare students and implications for future preparedness: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal interprofessional education vs. digital learning: enhancing Mpox preparedness in Saudi nursing students.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Navigating the new normal: understanding the impact of COVID-19 on e-learning readiness among nursing students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted healthcare systems and the training of healthcare professionals globally. This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and health literacy among 322 nursing and medical students in Saudi Arabia. Participants, selected through stratified random sampling, completed the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCoV-19 S) and the short-form Health Literacy (HLS-SF12) questionnaires. The results revealed that age, gender, academic year, and health literacy levels significantly influenced fear scores. Higher health literacy was associated with lower levels of fear, emphasizing the importance of education in alleviating pandemic-related anxiety. Key predictors of fear included personal COVID-19 experiences, perceived likelihood of infection, and symptom severity, while knowledge of prevention served as a protective factor. These findings can inform interventions aimed at enhancing health literacy and mental well-being among healthcare students, equipping them for future public health challenges. The study highlights the necessity for targeted education and communication strategies to effectively reduce fear during pandemics. Future research should examine additional factors influencing fear and evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.