ArticleScientific reports2025
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia compared to internal limiting membrane peeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perfluorocarbon liquid-assisted inverted multilayer internal limiting membrane flaps covering for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia with axial length ≥30 mm.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macular hole (MH) retinal detachment (MHRD) frequently causes severe visual impairment, mainly in older people with severe myopia and posterior staphyloma. Vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a treatment but has issues. The usefulness of an ILM inverted flap technique has not been clearly defined. Thus, we compared vitrectomy using this technique with vitrectomy using a complete ILM peeling technique for MHRD with severe myopia. The study included 29 patients (29 eyes) who underwent initial vitrectomy for MHRD with severe myopia between January 2011 and August 2019. The inverted ILM flap technique was used in 12 eyes (inverted group), and the complete ILM peeling technique was used in 17 eyes (peeling group). Clinical findings and outcomes were compared. In the peeling and inverted groups, the initial MH closure rate was 35.3% and 50% (p = 0.024) and the initial retinal reattachment rate was 82.4% and 75.0% (p = 0.630), respectively. The final retinal reattachment rate was 100% in both groups. The postoperative visual acuity during final consultation was better in the inverted than the peeling group. The inverted ILM flap technique may be more useful than the ILM peeling technique for MHRD in severely myopic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.