Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Shorter ovarian stimulation is detrimental to fresh embryo transfer outcomes in PCOS women undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study.

Shan Xiao, Su Liu, Ling Hong, Zhiqiang Liu, Rui Jia, Hongzhan Zhang, Meilan Mo, TuRui Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shan Xiao *Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Su Liu *Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Ling HongShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhiqiang LiuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Rui JiaShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hongzhan ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Meilan MoShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. dearalan@126.com.
TuRui YangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital (formerly Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital), Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Basic Research Program of Shenzhen JCYJ20220530172814032Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen JCYJ20210324123412035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder with dysfunctional ovulation affecting female fertility. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between gonadotropin (Gn) duration and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in PCOS women undergoing GnRH antagonist treatment. Retrospective cohort study at a large private fertility practice. Patients with PCOS undergoing the GnRHantagonist treatment between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2021 were included. Patients were classified into two groups depending on their Gn duration, ≤ 8 days (n = 501) and >8 days (n = 1326). After propensity score matching (PSM), there were 87 PCOS women with Gn duration ≤ 8 days and 137 PCOS women with Gn duration >8 days in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. The primary outcomes measures included the clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, early miscarriage and live birth rate between the two groups after fresh embryo transfer. In addition, the embryo quality was also evaluated. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. However, the total Gn dosage was lower in PCOS women in the ≤ 8 days group. In addition, the oocytes retrieved and D3 high quality embryos were compared between groups. However, the number of 2PN embryos was decreased in the group with Gn duration ≤ 8 days. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were significantly decreased in the ≤ 8 days group in fresh embryo transfer (52.87% vs. % 68.61%, 43.68% vs. 59.12%). After logistic regression, PCOS women with Gn duration ≤ 8 days were associated with poor clinical pregnancy and live birth rate. PCOS women with shorter Gn duration (≤ 8 days) were not associated with impaired embryo outcomes except for 2PN embryos in GnRH antagonist protocol. However, the shorter Gn stimulation was detrimental to clinical pregnancy outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycle.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHormone AntagonistsOvulation InductionPolycystic Ovary SyndromeAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHormone AntagonistsGnRHantagonistIn vitro fertilizationOvarian stimulationPCOSPregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40594896
PMCPMC12214806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.