ArticleScientific reports2025
Insight of biological transformation process in the anaerobic codigestion of kitchen waste with landfill site closure leachate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A 5-month anaerobic co-digestion was conducted using landfill site closure leachate as the inoculum stock solution and kitchen waste as the digestion material. This study investigated biogas production at varying kitchen waste loading rates, as well as changes in humic substances and microbial diversity in the digestate. The results demonstrated that when the waste loading rate was ≤ 2% (%w/w, dry mass ratio of kitchen waste) , the anaerobic co-digestion system efficiently degraded the kitchen waste, with over 90% of total gas production occurring within one day after the experiment commenced, indicating the rapid completion of the gasification process. The analysis of the digestate from the anaerobic co-digestion showed that the humic substance content was more than 20 times greater than that of landfill site closure leachate within 1 month, but the value approached the landfill site closure leachate within 5 months. This indicated the biological transformation of kitchen waste into humic substances was completed within 1 month, and these humic substances formed was essentially degraded within 5 months. The anaerobic co-digestion accelerated the process of kitchen waste spoilage. Additionally, the bacterial and archaeal communities in landfill site closure leachate and the digestate from the anaerobic co-digestion were analyzed, revealing that dominant bacterial groups were Proteobacteria(29.73% ~ 58.34%), Firmicutes(12.76% ~ 27.18%), and Bacteroidetes(9.07% ~ 28.17%), while the archaeal community included Methanobacterium(2.73% ~ 38.19%), Methaneta(1.05% ~ 40.09%), Methanosarcina(8.94% ~ 58.07%), and Methanoculleus(0.57% ~ 33.19%). These findings indicate that landfill site closure leachate serves as the primary source of methanogenic bacteria, and external sewage inoculum is unnecessary for the anaerobic co-digestion of landfill site closure leachate and kitchen waste. These research results will offer data support and technical support for the sustainable utilization of organic solid waste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.