ArticleScientific reports2025
An explainable RoBERTa approach to analyzing panic and anxiety sentiment in oral health education YouTube comments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reflections on Digital Simulation in Dental Morphology Education: Insights from a Randomized Controlled Trial.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in periodontics and peri-implant medicine: from diagnosis to precision care.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Online videos are vital for health education and medical decision-making, but their comment sections often spread misinformation, causing anxiety and confusion. This study identifies stress-inducing comments in oral health education content, aiming to improve mental health outcomes, educational effectiveness, user experience, and scalability. This study uses RoBERTa, a state-of-the-art language model, to advance Natural Language Processing (NLP) research and enable real-time feedback in social media environments. The RoBERTa-base configuration, with 12 transformer blocks, attention heads, and a 50,265-token vocabulary, was fine-tuned using optimized hyperparameters. The workflow includes data ingestion, token normalization, special character handling, embedding generation, transformer encoding, classification head processing, output generation, and evaluation metrics. This framework aims to enhance online health education discourse and establish automated comment moderation systems. The RoBERTa model achieved 75.00% overall accuracy in classifying panic and anxiety-inducing comments, with 74.76% precision and 0.800 recall for positive cases. While the model performed well in identifying relevant comments, its accuracy in panic and informative categories requires improvement. This study demonstrates the potential of RoBERTa-based deep learning for classifying dental-related comments, providing clinical insights and identifying areas for refinement. Although the model shows promise in detecting anxiety-inducing content, further optimization is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.