Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594859›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cacography based Ransomware Email Phishing Attack Prevention using Language Pack Tuned Transformer Language Model.

S Abiramasundari, V Ramaswamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S AbiramasundariComputer Science and Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Kumbakonam, India. sabiarul07@gmail.com.
V RamaswamyComputer Science and Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Kumbakonam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proposed cacography-based architecture tuned transformer method prevents novel ransomware email phishing (REP) attacks. Cybercriminals now create ransomware email phishing attacks through deceptive emails and text messages. Existing email phishing attacks detection based on email headers, keywords, redirect web link attempts, scanning the email body text, Uniform Resource Locator, IP address, domain name, payload analysis, unusual behaviour, network traffic, and embedded links. Existing phishing models never classify the text based on the language packs, Short Message Service language, textiShort Message Service and cacography words. This paper proposes a Language Pack-based Tuned Transformer Language (LPTTL) framework for email body text analysis, which prevents REP attacks. LPTTL framework consists of cacography algorithms such as (i) Language Pack Tuned Bidirectional Encoder Representation Transformer (LPT-BERT), (ii) Text-Text Transfer Transformer (LPT-T5) algorithms for detecting REP attacks through tokenizing the words and embedded email body words. Next, the proposed classification algorithms are (i) Lyrebird Optimization Algorithm-Long Short-Term Memory (LOA-LSTM), (ii) Hippopotamus Optimization (HO)-Gated Recurrent Neural Network (HO-GRU) and (iii) Meerkat Optimization Algorithm-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (MOA-BiLSTM) which are used for REP classification based on tokenized text. LPTTL framework has an accuracy of about 95.47%, precision of 96.8%, recall of 95.63% and F1-score of 96.21% compared to existing methods.

Indexed as

CacographyNatural language processingPhishing emailRecurrent neural networkTransformer model

Identifiers

PMID40594859
PMCPMC12215714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.