ArticleScientific reports2025
Prolonged administration of ritodrine hydrochloride in women with premature labor or threatened premature delivery based on empirical data in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Threatened preterm labor in Japan: an evidence-practice gap in diagnosis, tocolysis, and guideline implementation.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Japan, maintenance tocolysis has been conventionally administered. The current study aimed to identify the annual trends in the prolonged administration of ritodrine hydrochloride and its differences in terms of region and type of facility. This study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, and the survey included women with premature labor or threatened premature delivery based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, codes. The primary outcome was prolonged administration of ritodrine hydrochloride, defined as treatment for ≥ 4 days. The primary exposures were type of institution, regions where the institutions are located, and year at admission. The effect of each exposure on prolonged administration was assessed via multivariate-modified Poisson regression analysis. Of 280,734 female participants, 180,674 received prolonged administration of ritodrine hydrochloride. Women in primary hospitals had a significantly more prolonged duration of administration than those in tertiary hospitals. Prolonged administration was significantly more common in Hokkaido, Chubu, Kansai, and Shikoku than in Tokyo. Conversely, Kyushu had a significantly lower adusted risk ratio than Tokyo. The prolonged administration of ritodrine hydrochloride has been gradually decreasing annually. However, the rate differed in terms of regions and type of facility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.