ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating the Tree Drawing Test Depression Assessment Scale for adolescent depression screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depression in Chinese adolescents: prevalence, symptoms, risk factors, affected brain, diagnosis, and interventions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Tree-drawing test characteristics as potential predictors of adolescent depressive disorders.Ibrain · 2026Article
- Information quality of videos related to adolescent depression on social media platforms: a comparative study of TikTok and BiliBili.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the effectiveness of the Tree Drawing Test Depression Assessment Scale in screening for depressive disorders among adolescents. This study adopted a case-control design involving 50 adolescents diagnosed with depressive disorders and 54 healthy controls. Participants were administered the Tree Drawing Test (TDT), a subjective projective assessment tool that evaluates psychological states through the analysis of individually drawn tree images. In addition, computerized image recognition and data acquisition technologies were employed. The Tree Drawing Depression Assessment Scale was used for evaluation, and the results were subjected to statistical analysis. The total score differences between the depression group and the control group were statistically significant (p < 0.001). With a cutoff score of 13, the Youden Index was 0.761, sensitivity was 0.780, specificity was 0.981, and the positive and negative predictive values were 0.952 and 0.839, respectively. The Cohen's Kappa coefficient between the two raters ranged from 0.753 to 0.977. The Tree Drawing Depression Assessment Scale demonstrates good screening efficacy and effectively distinguishes adolescents with depressive disorders from healthy controls. It can serve as a preliminary screening tool for adolescent depression. However, this study has certain limitations, including a relatively small sample size and the absence of consideration for cultural differences, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Future research should expand the sample size and examine the tool's applicability across different cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.