ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting autism from written narratives using deep neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep neural networks and deep deterministic policy gradient for early ASD diagnosis and personalized intervention in children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the heterogeneity of language and communication abilities within the autistic population, challenges associated with the pragmatic (social) use of speech remain consistently observable across the entire spectrum of autism. Therefore, the study of narrative competence is particularly relevant, and there has been a considerable rise in research on narrative skills in autism. Most studies have focused on spoken narratives, with some describing the potential use of automated computational methods. In this study, we analyzed written narratives collected in a standardized manner during a national exam. We gathered 363 essays from students in the final eighth grade of primary school: 193 from autistic students (ASD Group) and 168 non-autistic peers (non-ASD Group). We tested several deep neural models to predict whether an essay was written by an autistic student or a student from the non-ASD Group. Several models achieved promising results, exceeding values of 0.85 for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy coefficients. In addition to studying narrative competence, the data from national exams and their utility in distinguishing autistic individuals may potentially pave the way for large-scale and cost-effective epidemiological studies on autism in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.