Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Classifying and diagnosing Alzheimer's disease with deep learning using 6735 brain MRI images.

Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, Khadijeh Moulaei, Leila Ahmadian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyed Mohammad MousaviMedical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Khadijeh MoulaeiHealth Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. moulaei.kh91@gmail.com.
Leila AhmadianStudent Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. ahmadianle@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional diagnostic methods for Alzheimer's disease often suffer from low accuracy and lengthy processing times, delaying crucial interventions and patient care. Deep convolutional neural networks trained on MRI data can enhance diagnostic precision. This study aims to utilize deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on MRI data for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and classification. In this study, the Alzheimer MRI Preprocessed Dataset was used, which includes 6735 brain structural MRI scan images. After data preprocessing and normalization, four models Xception, VGG19, VGG16 and InceptionResNetV2 were utilized. Generalization and hyperparameter tuning were applied to improve training. Early stopping and dynamic learning rate were used to prevent overfitting. Model performance was evaluated based on accuracy, F-score, recall, and precision. The InceptionResnetV2 model showed superior performance in predicting Alzheimer's patients with an accuracy, F-score, recall, and precision of 0.99. Then, the Xception model excelled in precision, recall, and F-score, with values of 0.97 and an accuracy of 96.89. Notably, InceptionResnetV2 and VGG19 demonstrated faster learning, reaching convergence sooner and requiring fewer training iterations than other models. The InceptionResNetV2 model achieved the highest performance, with precision, recall, and F-score of 100% for both mild and moderate dementia classes. The Xception model also performed well, attaining 100% for the moderate dementia class and 99-100% for the mild dementia class. Additionally, the VGG16 and VGG19 models showed strong results, with VGG16 reaching 100% precision, recall, and F-score for the moderate dementia class. Deep convolutional neural networks enhance Alzheimer's diagnosis, surpassing traditional methods with improved precision and efficiency. Models like InceptionResnetV2 show outstanding performance, potentially speeding up patient interventions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleNeural Networks, ComputerAlzheimerArtificial intelligenceDeep convolutional neural networksDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID40594827
PMCPMC12216300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.