ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning analysis of kinematic movement features during functional tasks to discriminate chronic neck pain patients from asymptomatic controls.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cannabinoid efficacy for pain: dose, chronicity and route.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the discriminative potential of a machine learning model using movement features during functional tasks to distinguish between patients with non-traumatic chronic neck pain and asymptomatic controls. The study included patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and asymptomatic controls. Inertial sensors analyzed kinematics during two tasks: elevated weight transfer task and water drinking. Movement was characterized using fifteen features, incorporated into machine learning models to assess how movement patterns relate to patient condition. Features included range of motion, peak velocity, smoothness, spatiotemporal inter-plane coordination, energy distribution by frequencies, and movement heterogeneity. Fifty-three patients with neck pain (36.27 ± 14.3 years; 14 men and 39 women) and 53 asymptomatic participants (35.43 ± 14.65 years; 32 men and 21 women) completed the study. Permutation tests evaluated the discriminative potential of neck movement features between groups. The elevated weight transfer task showed significant discriminative power (P = .0337 ± .0239; Accuracy = 0.618 ± 0.02), while the water drinking task did not (P = .215 ± .202). Movement heterogeneity was the most important discriminative feature, with chronic neck pain patients showing higher movement intensity fluctuations over time. Although the elevated weight transfer task showed statistically significant discriminative potential between asymptomatic individuals and those with chronic neck pain, the models correctly classified participants only 61.8% of the time. This result questions the potential of kinematic analysis to identify patients with chronic neck pain. Future research should investigate these models during more challenging tasks in samples of patients with higher neck pain intensity or disability levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.