Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594804›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Artificial sweeteners differentially activate sweet and bitter gustatory neurons in Drosophila.

Christian Arntsen, Jake Grenon, Isabelle Chauvel, Stéphane Fraichard, Stéphane Dupas, Jérôme Cortot, Kayla Audette, Pierre-Yves Musso, Molly Stanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian ArntsenDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Jake GrenonDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Isabelle ChauvelCentre des Sciences du Gout et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAe, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Stéphane FraichardCentre des Sciences du Gout et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAe, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Stéphane DupasCentre des Sciences du Gout et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAe, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Jérôme CortotCentre des Sciences du Gout et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAe, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Kayla AudetteDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Pierre-Yves MussoCentre des Sciences du Gout et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAe, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, F-21000, France. pierre-yves.musso@ube.fr.
Molly StanleyDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. molly.stanley@uvm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial sweeteners are highly sweet, non-nutritive compounds that have become increasingly popular over recent decades despite research suggesting that their consumption has unintended consequences. Specifically, there is evidence suggesting that some of these chemicals interact with bitter taste receptors, implying that sweeteners likely generate complex chemosensory signals. Here, we report the basic sensory characteristics of sweeteners in Drosophila, a common model system used to study the impacts of diet, and find that all noncaloric sweeteners inhibited appetitive feeding responses at higher concentrations. At a cellular level, we found that sucralose and rebaudioside A co-activated sweet and bitter gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs), two populations that reciprocally impact feeding behavior, while aspartame only activated bitter cells. We assessed the behavioral impacts of sweet and bitter co-activation and found that low concentrations of sucralose signal appetitive feeding while high concentrations signal feeding aversion. Finally, silencing bitter GRNs reduced the aversive signal elicited by high concentrations of sucralose and significantly increased sucralose feeding behaviors. Together, we conclude that artificial sweeteners generate a gustatory signal that is more complex than "sweetness" alone, and this bitter co-activation has behaviorally relevant effects on feeding that may help flies flexibly respond to these unique compounds.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterNeuronsSweetening AgentsTasteAnimalsDiterpenes, KauraneDrosophila ProteinsFeeding BehaviorReceptors, Cell SurfaceSucroseDiterpenes, KauraneDrosophila Proteinsgustatory receptor, Drosophilarebaudioside AReceptors, Cell SurfaceSucroseSweetening Agentstrichlorosucrose

Identifiers

PMID40594804
PMCPMC12216712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.