ArticleScientific reports2025
Bearing fault diagnosis based on cross image multi-attention mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bearing fault diagnosis based on multi-branch enhanced GhostNet with adaptive focal loss.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Resonance peak extraction method based on human ear model and its application in bearing fault diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bearings are crucial components of rotating machinery, and fault diagnosis is essential for ensuring the safe operation of mechanical systems. Neural networks, commonly used in bearing fault diagnosis, are effective in extracting deep features from fault signals but often fail to emphasize critical information. We propose a fault diagnosis method that integrates a cross-image multi-attention mechanism with a residual neural network. The collected vibration signals are first preprocessed using VMD-GAF and then fed into the network for fault detection. The results demonstrate that the CIMAM-ResNet18 model significantly enhances the robustness of signal processing, achieving an accuracy of 98.00% when tested on the experimental platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.