ArticleScientific reports2025
Air quality assessment in Beijing based on cloud model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Designing a residual-enhanced hybrid Prophet-LSTM framework for urban air pollution forecasting in Beijing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research employs the cloud model method to assess the outdoor air quality in Beijing over the past ten years. The study establishes standard and evaluation clouds for major air pollutants and constructs a comprehensive evaluation cloud model for the Air Quality Index (AQI) using aggregation functions and cloud model attributes. A novel normal cloud similarity measurement method based on the second-order Fréchet distance is adopted to conduct annual assessments. The core findings indicate a significant improvement in Beijing's air quality, with the AQI showing a continuous downward trend from moderate pollution in 2014 to mild pollution in 2023. Specific pollutants such as [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] have shown marked reductions, transitioning from good or light pollution levels to excellent ratings. The cloud model method effectively captures the probabilistic nature of pollutant concentrations, providing a more nuanced and rigorous assessment compared to traditional methods. These results validate the effectiveness and precision of the cloud model approach, offering actionable insights for environmental management and policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.