ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on properties of straw fiber steel slag foam concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this scholarly endeavor is to engineer an innovative, eco-friendly construction material, specifically straw fiber steel slag foam concrete (SFSSFC), with the dual purpose of optimizing resource utilization and mitigating energy expenditure within the construction sector. Through meticulous manipulation of the constituent ratios of steel slag powder, straw fiber, and foam, a series of 15 SFSSFC specimens were fabricated. Subsequent to their preparation, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted to ascertain their fluidity, water absorption, mechanical strength, thermal conductivity, and resistance to freeze-thaw cycling. The findings revealed that an increment in foam content correlates with enhanced fluidity and water absorption characteristics of the concrete matrix. Furthermore, it was determined that a 15% steel slag powder content yielded the most favorable mechanical strength outcomes. Notably, specimens incorporating 3% straw fiber displayed the lowest thermal conductivity among the evaluated samples. In assessing durability, the F10, F15, S15, and C3.0 specimens demonstrated exceptional resilience, enduring 50 cycles of freeze-thaw exposure without incurring damage. Comparative analysis with extant literature suggests that the SFSSFC developed in this study exhibits superior thermal and mechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.