Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594783›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bacterial infections in pediatric oncology patients- a single center experience.

Joanna Klepacka, Szymon Skoczeń, Magdalena Wojtaszek-Główka, Kacper Żurek, Wojciech Czogała, Kinga Kwiecińska, Zuzanna Zakrzewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Enterococcal bacteremia in children with malignancy or after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: real-world multicenter data from a nationwide survey in Poland (2014-2021).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Infections withJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanna KlepackaDepartment of Microbiology, University Children's Hospital, Wielicka 265, 30-663, Krakow, Poland.
Szymon SkoczeńDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663, Krakow, Poland. szymon.skoczen@uj.edu.pl.
Magdalena Wojtaszek-GłówkaStudent Scientific Group of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-664, Krakow, Poland.
Kacper ŻurekStudent Scientific Group of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-664, Krakow, Poland.
Wojciech CzogałaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663, Krakow, Poland. wojciech.czogala@uj.edu.pl.
Kinga KwiecińskaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663, Krakow, Poland.
Zuzanna ZakrzewskaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663, Krakow, Poland. zuzanna.zakrzewska@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with neoplasms have a high predisposition to bacterial infections, due to the implemented treatment that impairs immunity and numerous risk factors. Numerous research studies have been published on this problem but epidemiological studies are insufficient, and existing data are difficult to generalize on different populations. The aim of the study was to assess the epidemiology of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections and contaminations in cancer patients hospitalized between 2011 and 2021, with a focus on identifying predominant pathogens, resistance mechanisms, and evaluating the effectiveness of infection prophylaxis. We collected data of blood contaminations and infections epidemiology with cooperation with the Department of Clinical Microbiology UCH. Between 2011 and 2021, 7,667 blood samples were collected and 32,610 tests were performed on 1,914 patients. The analysed cultures were divided into 3 groups depending on the substrate specific for a given group of microorganisms. The number positive test result was 5.5%. The highest detection was noticed in 2021. Differences in the distribution of patients with positive and negative results in individual years were not statistically significant. The most common pathogen detected was Staphylococcus epidermidis, which was also the leader among Gram-positive microorganisms. There were not dominant species among the isolated Gram-negative microorganisms. Detection of anaerobic organisms was rare (only 4 different anaerobic organisms were isolated in single patients). The same was among the fungal observed. Mechanisms of resistance were included in the analysis of all identified strains- the most common was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Our results confirmed that bacterial infections are still a problem and may indicate the effectiveness of prophylaxis. Most of our results are consistent with the current literature, however we were able to highlight data unique to our patient population. Our findings can be helpful for clinical practice and be base for further research.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsNeoplasmsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleBacterial infectionsColonizationEpidemiologyPediatric hematologyPediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID40594783
PMCPMC12216908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.