Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Regret, policy, and discontinuance of gas vehicles: a cross-national study of Malaysia and Thailand.

Wanamina Bostan Ali, Long Kim, Gulmira Issayeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wanamina Bostan AliFaculty of Management Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.
Long KimCenter of Excellence in Logistics and Business Analytics (LOGBIZ), School of Accountancy and Finance, Walailak University, Nakhorn Si Thammarat, Thailand. long.ki@wu.ac.th.
Gulmira IssayevaCandidate of Economic Sciences, Department of Finance, M.Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a psychological element, regret functions as a reflective emotion that motivates people to assess their past behaviors along with their decision-making processes and life paths. While previous research has shown that regret determines satisfaction and attitudes and influences discontinued intentions, there is a lack of empirical data regarding its effect on travelers' decisions to stop using gas vehicles. This research explores how regret affects satisfaction and attitudes toward discontinued intentions in Malaysia's and Thailand's gas vehicle industries and examines government policy as a moderating factor. The research team invited 700 participants split equally between Malaysia and Thailand to complete a structured questionnaire. The path analysis of data demonstrated that regret had a substantial impact on traveler satisfaction across both countries. The study found that traveler attitudes in both national contexts were affected by both regret and satisfaction. Travelers in Malaysia and Thailand discontinued their future visits based on their levels of regret and satisfaction, which also shaped their attitudes. The study showed that government policy served as a moderating factor between regret and discontinued intention in both countries, which emphasizes how regulations affect consumer behavior. The study results reveal important details about how psychological aspects combine with policy responses to drive behavioral patterns related to gas vehicle use.

Indexed as

EmotionsAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultAttitudeCarbon dioxideDiscontinued intentionRegretSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40594748
PMCPMC12216853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.