ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying artificial intelligence-generated content using the DistilBERT transformer and NLP techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotion correction for weibo users via weakly supervised learning and semantic understanding.iScience · 2026Article
- Blind spots in artificial intelligence systems: poor identification of self-generated medical images-evidence-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of risk perception on perceived benefits of generative artificial intelligence users-an empirical study based on university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural language processing (NLP) has evolved significantly with the emergence of large language models (LLMs), leading to the rapid growth of artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC). This expansion raises critical challenges in ensuring content authenticity and preventing the spread of misinformation and plagiarism. The identification of AIGC is an active research area and is significant for maintaining the authenticity and credibility of digital content in academic and professional environments. In this research study, we focus on identifying AIGC based on state-of-the-art deep learning-based transformers and by exploring deep features of textual content. The proposed DistilBERT transformer is an advanced and lightweight form of bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), a well-known transformer of many LLMs that utilizes a distilled transformer architecture with self-attention mechanisms that dynamically weigh textual elements based on contextual relevance, effectively capturing linguistic patterns. Additionally, this study explores both traditional machine learning with textual features and deep learning models integrated with word embeddings such as GloVe and Fast Text. Experimental analysis demonstrated that the proposed DistilBERT-based model achieved a superior predictive accuracy of 98%, outperforming traditional deep learning models, such as long short-term memory (LSTM) with GloVe embeddings, which achieved 93% accuracy. Furthermore, qualitative assessments validate the model's effectiveness in confidently classifying diverse textual samples, reinforcing its practical reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.