Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594708›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting boiling heat flux, heat transfer coefficient, and regimes Non-intrusively using external acoustics and deep learning.

Doyeong Lim, Yang Liu, In Cheol Bang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doyeong LimDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Yang LiuDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
In Cheol BangDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Republic of Korea. icbang@unist.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning RS-2024-00403194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of boiling heat transfer is critical for the safety and efficiency of high energy-density systems, including data center cooling, nuclear reactors, and industrial boilers. Traditional diagnostic methods relying on intrusive sensors or visual inspection become impractical in harsh industrial environments characterized by high pressures, temperatures, and radiation exposure. In this paper, we propose a non-intrusive diagnostic framework combining externally measured acoustic emission (AE) signals with advanced deep learning techniques. Pool boiling experiments were conducted from natural convection to critical heat flux (CHF), and AE signals were externally collected under various boiling conditions. Through a comprehensive evaluation of hundreds of models, a transformer-based model demonstrated optimal performance, simultaneously predicting key boiling parameters-heat flux, heat transfer coefficient (HTC), and boiling regime-with prediction errors of less than 20% for heat flux and HTC, and over 98% accuracy in boiling regime classification. Further validation on subcooled flow boiling confirmed robust generalizability. Our results reveal that frequency-domain characteristics of AE signals strongly correlate with boiling phenomena, enabling interpretable and reliable diagnostics. This method provides simultaneous prediction of critical boiling parameters without invasive instrumentation, significantly enhancing operational safety and improving reliability in thermal management systems.

Indexed as

AcousticsBoilingBoiling regimeDeep learningHeat fluxHeat transfer coefficient

Identifiers

PMID40594708
PMCPMC12214782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.