ArticleScientific reports2025
An authorizable and preprocessable data transmission scheme based on elliptic curves.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current data security transmission schemes are based on the idea of signcryption, where the sender performs encryption and generates signatures within a single logical step. However, on one hand, the complexity of signing is relatively low, while the encryption and communication complexities for large amounts of data are high, leading to low overall transmission efficiency. On the other hand, once the receiver obtains the ciphertext, they can decrypt it, reducing the sender's control over the data. Therefore, this paper proposes a data security transmission scheme that supports authorization and preprocessing. The scheme first preprocesses the computationally expensive data encryption and transmission operations, and then performs the authorization signature to improve efficiency. Specifically, based on the R value from Schnorr's signature, the sender's public key, and the receiver's public key, a one-time public key is computed and used to encrypt the data before sending it to the receiver. The receiver can compute the corresponding one-time private key to decrypt and obtain the plaintext data, but only after receiving the s value from the sender's Schnorr signature. Additionally, before the authorization signature s is published, the receiver cannot decrypt the data, ensuring both authorization unforgeability and data confidentiality, while also enhancing the sender's control over the decryption timing. Experimental results show that for a 1KB data transmission, the execution times for the one-time public key generation algorithm, encryption algorithm, authorization algorithm, decryption algorithm, and signature verification algorithm were 3.34/28.37/0.58/3.32/4.58 ms, respectively, indicating high efficiency for each algorithm. Comparison tests show that for data sizes ranging from 50K to 1600K, using the preprocessing method can reduce execution time by about 68%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.