ArticleScientific reports2025
XAI-XGBoost: an innovative explainable intrusion detection approach for securing internet of medical things systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trustworthy AI-Powered Intrusion Detection for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Explainable Feature-Group-Aware Cross-Attentive Expert Fusion for IoMT Intrusion Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trustworthy and ethical intrusion detection for healthcare internet of medical things using reinforcement learning and governance rules.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption of IoT in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) has transformed healthcare delivery but faces critical challenges, including cybersecurity threats that endanger patient safety and data integrity. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are essential for protecting IoMT networks, yet conventional models often struggle with class imbalance, lack interpretability, and are unsuitable for real-world deployment in sensitive healthcare settings. This study aims to develop an innovative, explainable IDS framework tailored for IoMT systems that ensures both high detection accuracy and model transparency. The proposed approach integrates a hybrid random sampling technique to mitigate class imbalance, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) for feature selection, and an optimized XGBoost classifier for robust attack detection. Explainable AI techniques, namely SHAP and LIME, are employed to provide global and local insights into model predictions, enhancing interpretability and trustworthiness. The system was evaluated using the WUSTL-EHMS-2020 dataset, which contains network flow and biometric data, achieving outstanding performance: 99.22% accuracy, 98.35% precision, 99.91% recall, 99.12% F1-score, and 100% ROC-AUC. The proposed framework outperforms several traditional Machine Learning (ML) models and state-of-the-art IDS approaches, demonstrating its robustness and suitability for practical healthcare environments. By integrating advanced ML with explainable AI, this work addresses the critical need for secure, interpretable, and high-performing IDS solutions in IoMT systems. The study concludes that explainability is not an optional feature but a fundamental requirement in healthcare cybersecurity, and the proposed framework represents a significant step towards safer and more accountable AI-driven security solutions for the IoMT ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.