ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of in ovo stimulation with potential epigenetic modulators on immune system phenotype across three generations in a chicken model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic changes in embryonic blood of subsequent generations following in ovo stimulation with nutriepigenetic factors.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Nociceptive thresholds in broiler chickens are modulated by lameness of their progenitors and sex category.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transgenerational effects of in ovo stimulation with synbiotic and choline on gonadal tissue across three generations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications can influence the phenotypes of subsequent generations through intergenerational and transgenerational effects. The aim of the research was to assess the impact of epigenetic factors acting during embryonic development on the structure and cellular composition of lymphoid organs in three generations of chickens. Two groups of eggs were injected once (in the F1 generation) with a synbiotic (SYNs) or a synbiotic + choline (SYNCHs), while two other groups were injected in each successive generation (F2, F3-SYNr, SYNCHr). Synbiotic administration resulted in an increased cortex/medulla ratio of the thymus in the F1 but not in subsequent generations. In the spleen, an intergenerational effect (from F1 to F2) was found in the choline-supplemented (SYNCHs) groups but not in the SYNs groups. Not all changes observed in the F1 were evident in the F2 generation. No intergenerational effect was found in the cecal tonsil, and no transgenerational effects were observed in any of the tested organs. In ovo administration of synbiotics with choline may induce intergenerational phenotypic effects on specific immune organs. However, these effects either persisted through the first two generations or appeared solely in the F1 or F2 generations. Changes were evident in young birds but not in mature ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.