ArticleScientific reports2025
Attention mechanism based CNN-LSTM hybrid deep learning model for atmospheric ozone concentration prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Considering that ozone is essential to understanding air quality and climate change, this study presents a deep learning method for predicting atmospheric ozone concentrations. The method combines an attention mechanism with a convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network to address the nonlinear nature of multivariate time-series data. It employs CNN and LSTM to extract features from short time series, enhanced by the attention mechanism to improved short-term prediction accuracy. It takes eight meteorological and environmental parameters from 16,806 records (2018-2019) as input, which are selected principal component analysis (PCA). It features an attention-based CNN-LSTM hybrid deep learning model with specific settings: a time step of 5, a batch size of 25, 15 units in the LSTM layer, the ReLU activation function, 25 epochs, and an overfitting avoidance strategy with a dropout rate of 0.15. Experimental results demonstrate that this hybrid model outperforms individual models and the CNN-LSTM model, especially in forward prediction with a multi-hour time lag. The model exhibits a high coefficient of determination (R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.