Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of 8-week complex and resistance training on strength and power in adolescent long jumpers.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A practical complex training model for non-athletic populations: a randomized controlled trial on lower-limb power and sprint performance.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Effects of an eight-week French contrast training program on lower-limb explosive power, acceleration, and muscle strength in male college badminton players.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the effects of complex training (CT) and resistance training (RT) on lower-limb strength and power performance in adolescent long jumpers. It was hypothesized that complex training would result in more significant improvements in performance compared to traditional resistance training. A total of 36 male adolescent long jumpers (mean age 15 years) participated in an 8-week randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to either a complex training group (n = 18) or a resistance training group (n = 18). Strength and performance were measured before and after the intervention, including tests for one-repetition maximum (1RM) squat, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), vertical jump (VJ), standing long jump (SLJ), pre-stretch augmentation percentage (PSAP), and reactive strength index (RSI). Significant group × time interactions were observed for 1RM squat (p = 0.002, Partial η² = 0.965), IMTP (p < 0.001, Partial η² = 0.909), VJ (p < 0.001, Partial η² = 0.798), SLJ (p < 0.001, Partial η² = 0.894), and RSI (p = 0.001, Partial η² = 0.667). PSAP showed no significant interaction (p = 0.156), but a main effect of time was detected (p = 0.030). Complex training is a more effective strategy than resistance training for improving lower-limb strength and power in adolescent long jumpers. The combination of resistance and plyometric exercises in complex training leads to better performance outcomes, making it an optimal training method for long jumpers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.