ArticleScientific reports2025
Killer whale call detection rates vary among subspecies and populations in the North Pacific.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the North Pacific have diverged into subspecies with distinct diets, social structures, and vocal behaviors. Understanding the rate at which killer whales of different subspecies vocalize provides insight into their communication with conspecifics as well as the environmental factors shaping vocalization patterns. Estimating a population's calling rate can also enable the number of animals present to be estimated acoustically. We used killer whale dialects, long-term photo-identification records, and year-round autonomous acoustic data across multiple locations to estimate call detection rates during vocal bouts for three killer whale populations, one resident (fish-eating) and two transient (mammal-eating). We focused on call detection rates, or the number of calls detected rather than the true number produced, in order to capitalize on this large autonomous dataset to investigate the influence of spatiotemporal and social factors across many observations. Generalized additive mixed models showed that the call detection rate for southern Alaska resident killer whales was consistent across locations, seasons, which pod was calling, and the presence of other pods. Gulf of Alaska transient killer whale call detection rates differed across locations. We detected fewer, more tightly spaced discrete calls from AT1 transients than from Gulf of Alaska transients, and the mean AT1 call detection rate was stable across spatiotemporal factors. Although transients call less often than residents, we found that once vocalizing, they did so at a higher rate. These call detection rates provide novel insight into killer whale vocal behavior and can support passive acoustic group size estimation for these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.