Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594609›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A promising natural material for pollutants removal.

Andreea Elena Maftei, Maria Ignat, Marius Dobromir, Andrei Buzatu, Mariana Neamțu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreea Elena MafteiDepartment of Exact and Natural Sciences, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Bv. Carol I, no. 11, 700506, Iași, Romania.
Maria IgnatLaboratory of Materials Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Bv. Carol I, no. 11, 700506, Iași, Romania.
Marius DobromirDepartment of Exact and Natural Sciences, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Bv. Carol I, no. 11, 700506, Iași, Romania.
Andrei BuzatuDepartment of Geology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, 20A Carol I Blv., 700505, Iași, Romania.
Mariana NeamțuDepartment of Exact and Natural Sciences, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Bv. Carol I, no. 11, 700506, Iași, Romania. mariana.neamtu@uaic.ro.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS -UEFISCDI PN-IV-P1-PCE-2023-0303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural resources have multiple advantages, including being eco-friendly, inexpensive, non-toxic, and widely available, as well as having good activity in pollutant removal. This study explores the performance of Romanian volcanic tuff tested on two persistent dyes, Reactive Black 5 (RB5) and Methylene Blue (MB), via photo-Fenton-like oxidation. Different approaches, including Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and N

Indexed as

Photo-Fenton-like degradationPollutants removalReuseRomanian volcanic tuffSurface-enhanced Raman scattering

Identifiers

PMID40594609
PMCPMC12214588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.