Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quantitative modeling of rod outer segment phagocytosis and recycling.

Christina Kiel, Alexander J E Foss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christina KielDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy. christina.kiel@unipv.it.
Alexander J E FossDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. alexander.foss@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is continual turnover of macromolecules as part of maintenance. This allows removal of damaged macromolecules and their replacement. A prime example is the turnover of the rod photoreceptor outer segment. Every day, 10% of rod photoreceptor outer segments is phagocytosed by the neighboring retinal pigment epithelium cells where they undergo phagolysosomal degradation. For example, the proteins are broken down to their component amino acids. These components need to be efficiently recycled back to the rod photoreceptor, while the damaged components can be eliminated. These damaged molecules need to be replaced either by synthesis or from the circulation. Here, we calculate the demand fluxes for the different turnover processes relevant for outer segment phagocytosis. We show that the breakdown of proteins poses a potential osmotic problem. We develop computational models of rhodopsin digestion and recycling, which show that the duration of phagocytosis, digestion, and recycling of molecular components occur on a just in time basis. These findings imply that even modest impairments in lysosomal function, changes in protein abundances of key degradative enzymes or metabolite transporters could disrupt this fine-tuned process with potential consequences for photoreceptor survival.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhagocytosisRod Cell Outer SegmentAnimalsHumansLysosomesRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRhodopsinRhodopsinATPEnergy budgetOuter retinaPhagocytosisPhotoreceptorRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID40594606
PMCPMC12216174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.