Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bank data protection and fraud identification based on improved adaptive federated learning and WGAN.

Yunjiao Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yunjiao ZhengSchool of Economics Management and Law, Jilin Normal University, Siping, 136000, China. zyj1414867121@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance the protection of bank data privacy, build a more secure and efficient data privacy protection system, and effectively identify transaction fraud, this study first proposes an improved adaptive data protection architecture by combining federated learning and differential privacy technology. Then, a fraud recognition model is designed based on generative adversarial networks. The experiment outcomes show that the adaptive data protection architecture designed in this study notably raises the convergence performance of the loss function after introducing adaptive gradient pruning and noise differentiation strategies, with a minimum loss value of 0.09 and excellent learning ability. The accuracy of this method can reach 0.996, and its performance advantage is significant under low privacy budget. Meanwhile, after introducing attacks, the accuracy of this method decreases slightly and the probability of privacy leakage is low. The values of mutual information and re-identification risk analysis are the smallest, converging to 0.02 and 0.194, respectively. The class imbalance foundation of the research design validly raises the capability benefits of the dataset, and the fraud recognition model constructed from it has the best capability and the recognition precision. The missed and false alarm rates fluctuate within the range of 0.15-0.35. In summary, the research improves the data privacy protection capabilities of banks, which helps to reduce financial risks and enhance customer trust.

Indexed as

BankDifferential privacy mechanismFederated learningGenerative adversarial networksMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40594570
PMCPMC12219085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.