ArticleScientific reports2025
Bank data protection and fraud identification based on improved adaptive federated learning and WGAN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To enhance the protection of bank data privacy, build a more secure and efficient data privacy protection system, and effectively identify transaction fraud, this study first proposes an improved adaptive data protection architecture by combining federated learning and differential privacy technology. Then, a fraud recognition model is designed based on generative adversarial networks. The experiment outcomes show that the adaptive data protection architecture designed in this study notably raises the convergence performance of the loss function after introducing adaptive gradient pruning and noise differentiation strategies, with a minimum loss value of 0.09 and excellent learning ability. The accuracy of this method can reach 0.996, and its performance advantage is significant under low privacy budget. Meanwhile, after introducing attacks, the accuracy of this method decreases slightly and the probability of privacy leakage is low. The values of mutual information and re-identification risk analysis are the smallest, converging to 0.02 and 0.194, respectively. The class imbalance foundation of the research design validly raises the capability benefits of the dataset, and the fraud recognition model constructed from it has the best capability and the recognition precision. The missed and false alarm rates fluctuate within the range of 0.15-0.35. In summary, the research improves the data privacy protection capabilities of banks, which helps to reduce financial risks and enhance customer trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.