ArticleScientific reports2025
Unraveling the effects of FLASH and conventional irradiation on retinal pigment epithelial cells: in vitro and in vivo studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced corneal toxicity following whole brain irradiation in mice.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of 3D spheroids captures irradiation-induced structural and textural changes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FLASH radiotherapy preserves systemic and tissue homeostasis while maintaining antitumor efficacy.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding and Exacerbating the Biological Response of Uveal Melanoma to Proton Beam Therapy.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a fundamental monolayer of pigmented cells that supports visual function, situated between the neural retina and choroidal blood vessels. Radiotherapy is a common treatment for ocular tumors such as uveal melanoma; however, the RPE is inevitably exposed to radiation during treatment. FLASH radiotherapy, characterized by ultra-high dose-rates, has emerged as a promising approach to minimize normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Despite its potential, few preclinical studies have explored the effects of FLASH irradiation on the RPE, and no studies have directly compared FLASH with conventional (CONV) radiotherapy in this context. Using a LINAC capable of switching between FLASH and CONV irradiation, we here address the radiobiological effects on ARPE-19 cells, an in vitro RPE model, and the RPE of living mice. FLASH treatment demonstrated protective effects on ARPE-19 cells, enhancing cell viability and modulating cytokine expression (e.g., IL-6, IL-8). Furthermore, RPE tissue exhibited dose-dependent radiation sensitivity, with FLASH-irradiated mice performing better than CONV-treated ones. These findings indicate that FLASH radiotherapy may protect the RPE during ocular tumor treatment and provide insights into tissue-specific radiation sensitivity in the eye, supporting further research into its clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.