ArticleScientific reports2025
Pharmacovigilance study of drug-induced eye movement disorder based on FDA adverse event reports from 2004 to 2024.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating adverse events reported for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance assessment of gout: a real-world study using the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Neonatal-Onset Developmental Epileptic Encephalopathy due to 2q24.3 Microduplication Associated with Incidental Finding of RLBP1-Related Retinopathy.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye movement disorder (EMD) is a significant cause of visual impairment and disruption of daily activities. Drug-induced EMD is an underrecognized but critical risk factor for patients. This study aimed to explore the relationship between medications and EMD using real-world data to improve patient safety and clinical decision-making. A total of 6,158 reports of drug-induced EMD, involving 1,834 unique drugs, were analyzed from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) spanning Q1 2004 to Q4 2024. Disproportionality analysis revealed 30 drugs with significant associations with EMD, primarily within the central nervous system drug class, including antiseizure medications (vigabatrin, topiramate), antipsychotics (aripiprazole, risperidone), and antidepressants (sertraline, venlafaxine). The highest risks were observed with zonisamide (BCPNN = 3.03), vigabatrin (BCPNN = 2.82), and tiagabine (BCPNN = 2.79). Acyclovir and donepezil had the shortest onset times (median: 2 days). EMD-related adverse events were most commonly reported in middle-aged and elderly women (55.3%), and the number of cases has been steadily increasing over time. This study provides essential pharmacovigilance insights, identifying high-risk medications and demographic factors associated with drug-induced EMD, which can inform clinical practice and optimize patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.