Observational studyScientific reports2025
A prospective longitudinal cohort study for quality of life in patients undergoing fourth level liver surgery.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Performing fourth-level liver surgery is an exceptionally demanding procedure, fraught with significant risks and technical complexities. Patients undergoing such operations face elevated surgical hazards, substantial physical trauma, prolonged recovery periods, and a multitude of factors that can profoundly impact their postoperative quality of life (QoL). Despite these challenges, there remains a notable gap in the literature regarding the long-term QoL outcomes for these individuals. This study seeks to evaluate the QoL of patients who have undergone fourth-level liver surgery and to identify key factors influencing their recovery. The findings aim to offer clinical insights that can enhance postoperative care and improve patient outcomes. Employing a prospective longitudinal cohort design, this study enrolled patients who received fourth-level liver surgery at a major tertiary hospital in Chengdu, affiliated with a university. QoL assessments were conducted using the EQ-5D-5L scale at three intervals post-discharge: one week, one month, and three months. This study enrolled 125 participants and tracked their health-related QoL using the EQ-5D-5L Utility Index (UI) (health utility values). Initially, 1 week post-discharge, most patients' UI scores fell within the range of - 0.2 to 0.6. These values improved significantly over time, rising to 0.7-1.0 after 1 month and stabilizing between 0.8 and 1.0 by the 3 month mark. On average, patients reported experiencing pain for 4.18 days (± 9.72) following discharge. Statistical analyses-both univariate and multivariate-were performed to identify factors influencing QoL at different recovery stages. The findings revealed that admission method was a key determinant of QoL during the 1-3 month period post-discharge. Marital status emerged as a significant factor in the first week, while post-discharge pain levels primarily impacted QoL at the 1 month mark. After fourth-level liver surgery, the vast majority of patients regain their mobility, the ability to care for themselves, and their typical daily activities by 3 months post-discharge. Patients who are admitted to the emergency department tend to experience a lower QoL from 1 to 3 months following their discharge, compared to those who are admitted to the regular department. The persistent pain is a major culprit in diminishing a patient's overall well-being. Consequently, prompt pain management and rehabilitation workouts are essential for expediting recovery and enhancing the patient's QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.