ArticleScientific reports2025
Ecological succession of fishes in a large Amazonian off river reservoir.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Converting river flows into reservoirs is a major disturbance that triggers ecological succession, altering the functional and phylogenetic structure of aquatic communities. However, this process in off-river reservoirs remains understudied, despite its potential implications for biodiversity conservation. Here, we investigated fish assemblage colonization and establishment in a recently created off-river intermediate reservoir (IR) within the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Complex in the Amazon. Fish were sampled over seven years in the IR and compared to the main reservoir (MR) and a more pristine sector upstream (UP). Biodiversity in the IR increased over time, alongside shifts in species composition, traits, and phylogenetic structure. Dominance of large and benthic-rheophilic species rose, and the proportion of adults increased, indicating improved reproductive potential. These changes were likely influenced by environmental filtering, dispersal limitations, and resource scarcity during the initial years post-formation. Over time, the IR became more similar to the MR than the UP, reflecting species decay similarity and environmental resemblance between reservoirs. Dissimilarity between the IR and river sectors diminished as succession progressed. Our results suggest IR may serve as a refuge for endemic and rare rheophilic fish, supporting fish stocks for riverine communities and offering a conservation tool amid hydropower development and climate change. The true test of the IR's value for local biodiversity will unfold as it ages, making consistent monitoring of the IR essential to assess its long-term ecological impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.