ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnostic value of CT scan findings for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection without ileostomy in rectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Post-Operative Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak by Local Electrophysiological Parameters: Multicenter Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications following colorectal surgery, particularly in patients who have undergone low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer without a protective ileostomy. The early detection of AL is crucial, as it can significantly impact the patient's recovery and survival rates. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal Computed Tomography(CT) scans in identifying AL among rectal cancer patients post-LAR. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Tehran Surgical Research Center and included 42 patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. All patients received an abdominal CT scan on the fifth postoperative day. The presence of AL was confirmed based on clinical symptoms, radiological findings, and the necessity for reoperation. The study focused on evaluating specific CT findings, such as perianastomotic collections, to determine their correlation with AL. The analysis revealed that certain CT scan findings, particularly complex collections larger than 5 cm in proximity to the anastomosis site and signs of generalized peritonitis, were significantly associated with the presence of AL. These findings were particularly important in cases where patients also exhibited clinical symptoms like fever and leukocytosis. The presence of these CT indicators often necessitated reoperation to address the leakage. The results of this study suggest that while abdominal CT scans are a valuable tool in the early detection of AL, the interpretation of these scans must be done in conjunction with clinical symptoms. The study highlights the importance of considering the size of perianastomotic collections and the presence of systemic symptoms for an accurate and timely diagnosis of AL. Future research should further investigate the potential of CT scans in improving outcomes for patients undergoing LAR for rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.