ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive datasets for RNA design, machine learning, and beyond.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA design: update on computational frameworks and programs for inverse RNA folding.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- SamplingDesign: RNA design via continuous optimization with coupled variables and Monte-Carlo sampling.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA molecules are essential in regulating biological processes such as gene expression, cellular differentiation, and development. Accurately predicting RNA secondary structures and designing sequences that fold into specific configurations remain significant challenges in computational biology, with far-reaching implications for medicine, synthetic biology, and biotechnology. While machine learning methodologies have been proposed to enhance prediction capabilities, they require high-quality training data. The lack of standardized benchmark datasets further hinders the development and evaluation of these tools. To address this, we created a comprehensive dataset of over 320 thousand instances from experimentally validated sources to establish a new community-wide benchmark for RNA design and modeling algorithms. Our dataset comprises numerous challenging structures for which state-of-the-art RNA inverse folders provide results of varying accuracy. We demonstrated the potential of the dataset by testing it with several popular open-source RNA design algorithms. Furthermore, we illustrated how our dataset can be used to train machine learning models that consider both RNA sequence and structure, potentially advancing RNA design and prediction capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.