ArticleScientific reports2025
Using graph machine learning to identify functioning in patients with low back pain in terms of ICF.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A call for action to strengthen stakeholder readiness for ICF data exchange in European health data space: a structured narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a comprehensive perspective on functioning is useful in patient assessments, the WHO developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) to provide a standardized terminology and framework for describing and classifying human functioning. However, its complex structure poses a problem for implementation as part of clinical practice.The aim of this study was to test a graph machine learning engine, Headai Graphmind, to recognize ICF codes from electronic health records written in Finnish. A dataset of 93 patients aged 18 to 65 years with chronic low back pain was collected. Headai Graphmind was then tested for its ability to match free text with ICF codes on a sample of 20 patients. The results were compared against the findings of a domain expert. Headai Graphmind achieved 0.95 precision, 0.83 recall, and 0.89 F1 score.The application found 112 distinct ICF codes compared to 119 codes found by the domain expert. Headai Graphmind has the capability to recognize ICF codes from the electronic health records of patients with chronic low back pain. The method could be helpful when implementing the ICF classification in clinical practice, and enable retrospective coding of medical information for further use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.