ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization for threat classification of various data types-based on ML model and LLM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of AI technology, the number of cyber security threats that exploit it is increasing rapidly, and it is urgent to build an effective security threat detection system to respond to these threats. There is active research on AI-based security tools to detect and respond to these security threats. This study explores how heterogeneous data, such as signs of security attacks from security threat news and weaknesses in source code, can be analyzed integrally in an ML model and LLM environment. In this study, we applied scaling and normalization techniques to the Post News data to improve bias, and we used syntax analysis, semantic analysis, and data flow information to perform an integrated analysis of the source code to improve detection performance. It is designed to be applied to both ML models and LLM by systematizing data labeling and data formats. The results showed that the constructed learning model performed well in both text analysis and source code analysis. In the post-news data learning, the ML-based models XGBoost, SVM, and Random Forest all showed f1-scores of 0.96 to 0.97, while the LLM-based models ST5-xxl, XLNet, BERT, CodeBERT, and GraphCodeBERT all showed a score of 0.97. Additionally, in the C/C++ weakness code detection data learning, the LLM series model ST5-xxl achieved 0.9999, XLNet achieved 0.9999, BERT achieved 0.9037, CodeBERT achieved 0.9999, and GraphCodeBERT achieved 0.9999. The ML-based model XGBoost showed an accuracy of 0.9999 with the TF-IDF embedding method, SVM showed 0.9699 with the TF-IDF embedding method, and Random Forest showed 0.9493 with the TF-IDF method. The models demonstrated higher performance with the TF-IDF embedding method than with the Word2Vec embedding. This study proposed an ML and LLM integrated framework that could effectively detect source code vulnerabilities using abstract syntax trees (AST). This framework overcame the limitations of existing static analysis tools and improved detection accuracy by simultaneously considering the structural characteristics and semantic context of the code. In particular, by combining AST-based feature extraction with LLM's natural language understanding capabilities, it improved generalization performance for new types of vulnerabilities and significantly reduced false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.