Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploration of the antitumor effect and mechanism of gambogic acid on osteosarcoma through network pharmacology and experimental pharmacology study.

Mei Hu, Zhe Zhang, Cui Yan, Ximin Wang, Jun Tong, Guangru Li, Xianjing Hu, Congyan Zeng, Weibo Dai, Dawei Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mei Hu *Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China.
Zhe Zhang *Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China.
Cui Yan *Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China.
Ximin WangZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China.
Jun TongZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China.
Guangru LiZhanjiang Institute of Clinical Medicine, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, 524000, Guangdong, China.
Xianjing HuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research and Development of Natural Drugs, School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Congyan ZengZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China. zszcy@126.com.
Weibo DaiZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China. daiweibo007@163.com.
Dawei GaoZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, 528401, China. gaodawei0829@163.com.

Funding

Guangdong Medical Research Foundation A2022479Guangdong Medical Research Foundation A2024048Guangdong Provincial Basic and Applied Basic Research Project 2023A1515011699Science and Technology Major Project of Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province 2023B3016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a highly aggressive bone cancer in children and adolescents with extremely poor prognosis. Gambogic acid (GA) is a natural compound derived from the resin of Garcinia hanburyi trees and has been reported to possess multiple antitumor effects. However, the comprehensive mechanism of GA intervention in OS remains unclear. In this study, network pharmacology and experiment pharmacology were employed to elucidate the mechanism by which GA inhibited OS. Firstly, GA exhibited significant inhibitory effects on OS in vitro and in vivo. Then, the network pharmacological analysis and molecular docking predicted 9 targets involved in necroptosis and apoptosis induced by GA in OS. The qRT-PCR and western blotting verified that GA could increase the apoptosis-related mRNA and protein expression levels, such as cleaved caspase-3, cleaved PARP, indicating that GA could activate apoptosis. Furthermore, proteins related to necroptosis such as RIPK1, RIPK3, and p-RIPK3 were upregulated, while MLKL initially increased and then decreased, implying a dynamic regulation of necroptosis signaling. In summary, our results identified potential targets and pathways of GA to exert anti-osteosarcoma effect, suggesting that GA is a candidate drug for the treatment of osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaXanthonesAnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMolecular Docking SimulationNecroptosisNetwork PharmacologySignal TransductionXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agentsgambogic acidXanthonesApoptoticExperimental verificationGambogic acidNecroptosisNetwork pharmacologyOsteosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID40594358
PMCPMC12217490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.