ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of soil Bio-Cementation improvement using Persian gum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving the bearing capacity of helical tapered piles using gum injection in FCV.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has emerged as a sustainable soil improvement method over the past few decades. Despite its promise, challenges persist in controlling the injection rate of the cementation solution (CS) and mitigating the emission of harmful gases during the bio-cementation process. This study introduces Persian Gum (PG) as an additive to the MICP process to address these issues, enhancing the practical applications of bio-cementation. Direct shear tests were conducted to evaluate the effects of PG on the cementation process and the shear strength characteristics of MICP-treated sands. Samples were treated with varying volumes of bacterial and cementation solutions, PG concentrations, and spraying intervals of the CS and PG solutions. Results indicate a substantial increase in soil shear strength, ranging from 3.1 to 9.8 times, depending on the normal stress level. Additionally, this method effectively controls the application rate of CS and significantly reduces the emissions of carbon dioxide and ammonia by up to 20 times compared to the conventional MICP process. The test results along with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses, reveal that the incorporation of PG not only enhances soil strength by up to 20% compared to traditional MICP but also naturally regulates the cementation process rate. This innovation eliminates the need for external control of CS application, making the treatment procedure more time-efficient and eco-friendly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.