ArticleScientific reports2025
The QDIS-7: using one scale to measure the disease-specific quality-of-life impact of different medical conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of life in hyperkalemia: baseline analysis of a cohort study of management of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Effects of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on the quality of life of patients with hyperkalemia undergoing hemodialysis: Y-QOL study design.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When measuring disease-specific quality of life (QOL), scores from different instruments can almost never be compared, so clinical and research questions involving more than one disease cannot be answered. To overcome that limitation, the Quality of Life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS-7) uses standardized content and only one metric. We tested whether QDIS-7 scores are comparable across diseases. In an online survey, 2,627 adults who had sought care for headache, low-back pain, asthma, or diabetes, responded to the QDIS-7 and to a previously-validated disease-specific QOL instrument ("legacy scale") that measured QOL in their specific disease. Using the slopes of four independent regressions of legacy-scale scores on QDIS-7 scores, we tested the hypothesis that QDIS-7 scores can be compared across those four different medical conditions. The four regression-line slopes were nearly identical: 0.12 to 0.14 legacy-scale standard deviations per 1-point difference in QDIS-7 score. Thus, each 10-point difference in QDIS-7 scores was equal to slightly more than one standard-deviation difference in legacy-scale scores, for all four groups. The equivalence of the four slopes supports the use of the QDIS-7 to compare disease-specific QOL across different medical conditions. Thus, QDIS-7 users can answer clinical and research questions that are otherwise impossible to address.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.