Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594348›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The QDIS-7: using one scale to measure the disease-specific quality-of-life impact of different medical conditions.

Shunichi Fukuhara, Joseph Green, Takafumi Wakita, Yosuke Yamamoto, Hajime Yamazaki, John E Ware

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shunichi FukuharaSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. fukuhara.shunichi.6m@kyoto-u.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-1495
Joseph GreenGraduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. jgreen@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-2308
Takafumi WakitaKansai University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-5918
Yosuke YamamotoDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1104-2612
Hajime YamazakiSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-4370
John E WareJohn Ware Research Group, Watertown, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-2149

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, through the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H03024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When measuring disease-specific quality of life (QOL), scores from different instruments can almost never be compared, so clinical and research questions involving more than one disease cannot be answered. To overcome that limitation, the Quality of Life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS-7) uses standardized content and only one metric. We tested whether QDIS-7 scores are comparable across diseases. In an online survey, 2,627 adults who had sought care for headache, low-back pain, asthma, or diabetes, responded to the QDIS-7 and to a previously-validated disease-specific QOL instrument ("legacy scale") that measured QOL in their specific disease. Using the slopes of four independent regressions of legacy-scale scores on QDIS-7 scores, we tested the hypothesis that QDIS-7 scores can be compared across those four different medical conditions. The four regression-line slopes were nearly identical: 0.12 to 0.14 legacy-scale standard deviations per 1-point difference in QDIS-7 score. Thus, each 10-point difference in QDIS-7 scores was equal to slightly more than one standard-deviation difference in legacy-scale scores, for all four groups. The equivalence of the four slopes supports the use of the QDIS-7 to compare disease-specific QOL across different medical conditions. Thus, QDIS-7 users can answer clinical and research questions that are otherwise impossible to address.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAsthmaDiabetes MellitusFemaleHeadacheHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40594348
PMCPMC12219845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.