ArticleScientific reports2025
Metagenomics reveals functional profiles of gut microbiota during the recovery phase of acute pancreatitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Nutritional modulation of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: metabolic pathways, inflammatory signaling, and diet-responsive clinical outcomes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Beyond the Pancreas: The Gut Microbiota in Acute Pancreatitis - From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Perspectives.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gut microbiota play a critical pathogenic role in acute pancreatitis (AP). This study aimed to investigate the composition and function of gut microbiota during the recovery phase of AP. Rectal swab samples obtained from 12 AP patients of varying severity during both the acute and recovery phases were sequenced using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We analysed α-diversity, enterotypes, and the dominant microbiome composition, and performed differential analysis of gut microbiota composition and functional enrichment. During the recovery phase of AP, microbial diversity remained decreased, and minimal difference were observed in the structural diversity of the microbiome. There was an increasing tendency of beneficial bacteria (Bacteroidales) and a decreasing tendency of harmful bacteria (Firmicutes) in the recovery phase of mild AP (MAP). However, in the recovery phase of moderately severe AP (MSAP) and severe AP, Enterococcus abundance increased compared with that in the acute phase. Some signalling pathways showed opposite trends in the recovery phase of MAP and MSAP compared to the acute phase. These results suggested that gut microbiome composition and function are associated with AP recovery, which may inform strategies for the treatment and prognosis of AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.