ArticleScientific reports2025
MR analysis reveals no causal association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and osteoporosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal relationship between aging-related biomarkers and osteoporosis: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Observational studies have suggested a connection between mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and osteoporosis, but the causal role of mtDNA-CN remains uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the causal association between mtDNA-CN and osteoporosis using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data were utilized. Four MR methods-inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Egger-were applied, with IVW as the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses included the MR-PRESSO test to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Outcomes comprised bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at total body, lumbar spine, femoral neck, and forearm. No significant causal relationship was observed between mtDNA-CN and osteoporosis. IVW results showed odds ratios (ORs) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.89-1.05, P = 0.427) for total BMD, 1.00 (95% CI 0.87-1.15, P = 0.977) for lumbar spine BMD, 1.00 (95% CI 0.89-1.12, P = 0.988) for femoral neck BMD, and 0.90 (95% CI 0.70-1.16, P = 0.421) for forearm BMD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept P > 0.05) or outliers (MR-PRESSO P > 0.05). This MR study found no causal effect of mtDNA-CN on osteoporosis risk across multiple skeletal sites. The null association challenges prior observational hypotheses, suggesting mtDNA-CN may not be a primary determinant of osteoporosis. Further research is warranted to explore alternative mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.