ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of public and expert perceptions of electrified vehicles in the European Union.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thematic Mapping and Evolution of Social Media Mining in Health Research: Hybrid Bibliometric Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transition to electric vehicles is widely regarded as an effective measure to combat climate change, and its success will utterly depend on the willingness of consumers to shift to this technology, making it essential to examine public perception when designing supportive policies. Nonetheless, public perception can be biased by multiple factors such as fake news, prejudices and misgivings, leading to a significant divergence from the views of experts in the transportation field. This paper examines the differences between the views of these two groups on electric vehicles, with a specific focus on the current perception in the European Union. The research adopts a two-fold approach, starting with an empirical driving study, followed by a series of focus group discussions with transportation experts and an analysis of Twitter (formally X) data. The data for this study was collected over five years, from June 2019 to June 2024. The findings indicate that both groups generally maintain a neutral stance, with neutrality appearing in 50% of their responses. However, experts tend to prefer battery electric vehicles, positively influenced by their driving experiences. In 40% of their comments, they report favourable sentiments toward these vehicles. Conversely, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are favoured by the general public, with 35% of tweets indicating a positive attitude, as they are viewed as a more established technology. Differing perspectives on vehicle charging infrastructure are evident: specialists regard it as a hindrance to widespread adoption, with 30% expressing negative views, whereas the general population appears less concerned and more focused on the feelings and the experience of driving.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.