Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594306›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of public and expert perceptions of electrified vehicles in the European Union.

Andromachi Mourtzouchou, Andres L Marin, Lorenzo Laveneziana, Alessandro Tansini, Jaime Suarez, Ada Garus, Monica Grosso, Fernando Martínez-Plumed, Rubén Cordera, Georgios Fontaras and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andromachi Mourtzouchou *Departamento de Transportes y Tecnología de Proyectos y Procesos, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Andres L Marin *VRAIN, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Lorenzo Laveneziana *Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro TansiniJoint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Jaime SuarezJoint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Ada GarusJoint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Monica GrossoJoint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Fernando Martínez-PlumedVRAIN, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Rubén CorderaDepartamento de Geografía, Urbanismo y Ordenación del Territorio, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Georgios FontarasJoint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. georgios.fontaras@ec.europa.eu.
Biagio CiuffoJoint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. biagio.ciuffo@ec.europa.eu.

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana CIPROM/2022/6Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación FISCALTICS (I+D+i PID2022-140110OA-I00)Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-122830OB-C42 (SFERA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition to electric vehicles is widely regarded as an effective measure to combat climate change, and its success will utterly depend on the willingness of consumers to shift to this technology, making it essential to examine public perception when designing supportive policies. Nonetheless, public perception can be biased by multiple factors such as fake news, prejudices and misgivings, leading to a significant divergence from the views of experts in the transportation field. This paper examines the differences between the views of these two groups on electric vehicles, with a specific focus on the current perception in the European Union. The research adopts a two-fold approach, starting with an empirical driving study, followed by a series of focus group discussions with transportation experts and an analysis of Twitter (formally X) data. The data for this study was collected over five years, from June 2019 to June 2024. The findings indicate that both groups generally maintain a neutral stance, with neutrality appearing in 50% of their responses. However, experts tend to prefer battery electric vehicles, positively influenced by their driving experiences. In 40% of their comments, they report favourable sentiments toward these vehicles. Conversely, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are favoured by the general public, with 35% of tweets indicating a positive attitude, as they are viewed as a more established technology. Differing perspectives on vehicle charging infrastructure are evident: specialists regard it as a hindrance to widespread adoption, with 30% expressing negative views, whereas the general population appears less concerned and more focused on the feelings and the experience of driving.

Identifiers

PMID40594306
PMCPMC12214769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.