ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of cardiovascular diseases based on GBDT+LR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning-Derived Nomogram Model to Predict Population Health Literacy: Cross-Sectional Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, there are over 300 million patients with cardiovascular diseases in China. With the acceleration of population aging, the impact of cardiovascular diseases is becoming increasingly severe. Accurately and efficiently predicting the potential risks of cardiovascular disease is crucial for preventing its progression and maintaining public cardiovascular health. This article uses a combination of gradient-boosting decision trees (GBDT) and logistic regression (LR) to predict the probability of cardiovascular disease risk. To address the weak feature combination ability of LR in handling nonlinear data, a cardiovascular disease prediction model was established by integrating GBDT with LR by using the predicted results of GBDT as new features instead of the original ones and inputting them into the LR model. Using the UCI cardiovascular disease dataset, we conduct experimental comparisons between the proposed model and other common disease classification algorithms such as logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The experimental results show that GBDT+LR outperforms other models in multiple evaluation indicators such as accuracy, precision, specificity, F1 value, MCC, AUC, and AUPR. The cardiovascular disease prediction model using the GBDT+LR algorithm has the best prediction performance. This article builds a front-end and back-end separated cardiovascular disease analysis and prediction platform based on the Spark Big data framework and Vue+SpringBoot framework, which realizes predicting cardiovascular disease risk probability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.