Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594281›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Survival analysis for sepsis patients: A machine learning approach to feature selection and predictive modeling.

Kaida Cai, Xiaofang Yang, Zhengyan Wang, Wenzhi Fu, Hanwen Liu, Fatemeh Mahmoudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaida CaiSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China. caikaida@seu.edu.cn.
Xiaofang YangSchool of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Zhengyan WangSchool of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Wenzhi FuSchool of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Hanwen LiuSchool of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Fatemeh MahmoudiDepartment of Mathematics and Computing, Faculty of Science and Technology, Mount Royal University, Calgary, T3E 6K6, Canada.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2242023R40055National Natural Science Foundation of China 12301334Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20230804Pansheng Project of Southeast University 4025002409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that presents substantial challenges to healthcare and pharmacological management due to its high mortality rates and complex patient responses. Accurately predicting patient outcomes is essential for optimizing therapeutic interventions and improving clinical decision-making. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Cox proportional hazards model and advanced machine learning techniques, such as extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and random survival forests (RSF), in forecasting survival outcomes for sepsis patients. Feature selection methods, including adaptive elastic net (AEN), smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD), minimax concave penalty (MCP), and information gain (IG), were employed to refine model performance by identifying the most relevant clinical features. The results demonstrate that XGBoost consistently outperforms the Cox model, achieving a higher concordance index and demonstrating superior accuracy in handling complex, non-linear clinical interactions. The integration of feature selection further enhanced the machine learning models' predictive capabilities. These findings emphasize the potential of machine learning techniques to improve outcome prediction and guide personalized treatment strategies, offering valuable tools for critical care settings.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSepsisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisFeature selectionMachine learningMissing data imputationSepsisSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID40594281
PMCPMC12218378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.