ArticleScientific reports2025
Fuzzy cooperative game analysis within the international railway freight coalition framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
International railway freight cooperation is essential for enhancing regional logistics efficiency, especially in the context of rising anti-globalization trends and pandemic-induced disruptions to maritime transport. This study aims to develop a stable and equitable allocation mechanism for freight volume and operating revenue (freight revenue collected by a country's rail system or designated freight operators) under the international rail freight coalition framework. We construct a fuzzy cooperative game model that accounts for export demand, participation levels, transport resource utilization, and return empty load rates. Results from the CSERE case show that the proposed scheme increases total operating revenue by 37.85-204.88% for member countries compared to traditional mileage-based allocations, and reduces the return empty load rate from 40 to 7.83%. The fuzzy coalition model ensures fair compensation for disadvantaged countries and enhances the overall stability of cooperation. These findings offer practical insights for policymakers and rail freight operators aiming to promote efficient multilateral trade logistics. The originality of this work lies in integrating fuzzy coalition game theory with real-world data to address strategic behavior and empty return issues in international rail freight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.