ArticleScientific reports2025
Behavioural response of prey to repeated attacks by non-coordinating predators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental evidence for a suction-biting performance tradeoff in Mesoamerican cichlids.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Mixing of a binary passive particle system using smart active particles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collective behaviour is a ubiquitous phenomenon entailing the emergence of fascinating pattern formations in organisms. Reduction of predation risk is presumed to be a major factor contributing towards the evolution of such behaviour. However, the effect of persistent attacks by multiple predators on the behavioural response of the prey remains largely unexplored. The current work aims to address this issue using an agent-based approach employing an underdamped Langevin model. A continuous transition in prey response from a cohesive escape to split-and-escape is discussed with respect to the angular configuration of the predators before the attack. The statistics show that the attack on the nearest prey is the most successful pursuit strategy, while alternative strategies, such as attacking the centre of the group, have conspicuous ancillary effects, such as group splitting. A long-term temporal study of the system indicates a counter-intuitive faster decay of prey numbers at higher intensity of prey coordination, hinting at possible excess alignment and its detrimental effects in the case of successive predator attacks. The effect of predation is found to be non-additive even if non-coordinating predators are considered, highlighting the non-scalability of predator-prey systems and urging further scrutiny of the dynamics of group hunting in such systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.