ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid rule-based NLP and machine learning approach for PII detection and anonymization in financial documents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in financial documents is essential to prevent data breaches and maintain regulatory compliance. This research presents a scalable hybrid approach that integrates rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML) approaches, and a custom Named Entity Recognition (NER) model for the accurate detection and anonymization of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). A varied and accurate synthetic dataset was created to replicate genuine financial document formats, enhancing model training and assessment. The model has attained a precision of 94.7%, a recall of 89.4%, an F1-score of 91.1%, and an overall accuracy of 89.4% on synthetic datasets. Additional validation on actual financial documents, such as audit reports and vendor bills, revealed a consistent performance with an accuracy of 93%. The study utilizes confusion matrices, ROC curves, and precision-recall curves to evaluate the model which further validates the model's capabilities and generalization ability. The suggested approach provides a robust and efficient solution for protecting sensitive information in operational financial contexts, markedly enhancing current methods for PII protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.