ArticleScientific reports2025
Quality assessment of pistachio fruit cultivated under shade netting structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using shade nettings reduce the damage to the pistachio. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of pistachios produced under a shade netting system and sunlight. The quality of dried kernels after 0, 3, and 6 months of storage (20 ± 2 °C) in terms of compounds (carbohydrate, fat, protein, and total chlorophyll content), antioxidant capacity, hardness, color, and sensory evaluation were examined. Carbohydrate content in pistachios under the shade netting was lower than in pistachios without the shade netting. The fat content at zero and after 6 months of storage (55%) showed a significant increase. There was no considerable difference in protein content in pistachios with and without shade nettings. There was a significant difference between the chlorophyll content at zero (72.0 μmol g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.