Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Forest fragmentation and heterogeneity shape the occurrence of woodpecker species in Central Europe.

Michał Bełcik, Bartłomiej Woźniak, Piotr Skórka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michał BełcikInstitute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Kraków, Poland. belcik@iop.krakow.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-2064
Bartłomiej WoźniakDepartment of Forest Zoology and Wildlife Management, Institute of Forest Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr SkórkaInstitute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland 2014/14/E/NZ8/00165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study investigates the impact of fragmentation metrics and other forest characteristics on the occurrence and richness of woodpecker species in 163 forest patches in Southern Poland. Generalised linear mixed models were used to estimate the influence of fragmentation metrics (patch size, nearest-neighbour distance, proximity index, patch shape) and forest stand features (age, proportion of coniferous tree species, proportion of dominant tree species) on woodpecker presence and woodpecker species richness. Eight woodpecker species were identified during surveys, and the study found that forest patch size positively correlated with the probability of occurrence for the great spotted woodpecker and black woodpecker but negatively with the occurrence of wryneck. The nearest-neighbour distance between two forest patches and the proximity index were negatively correlated with the occurrence of the lesser spotted woodpecker. The shape index negatively influenced the occurrence of the great spotted woodpecker but positively the occurrence of the wryneck. The European green woodpecker occurrence probability decreased with the proportion of coniferous tree species. Woodpecker species richness was positively associated with forest patch size and age, but negatively with the proportions of coniferous trees and dominant tree species. These findings indicate that forest fragmentation is a major driver of woodpecker species occurrence and richness, along with habitat quality characteristics.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBirdsForestsAnimalsEcosystemEuropePolandTreesBird diversityConnectivityHabitat qualityLandscapeWoodlandWoodpeckers

Identifiers

PMID40594230
PMCPMC12216957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.