ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of drinking water quality and health risk assessment in rural primary schools along the Thai Myanmar border.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of drinking water suitability in rural primary school environments: linking hydrochemistry, multivariate analysis, and water quality indices in Northern Uganda.Journal of water and health · 2026Article
- Assessment of water quality and microbial contamination in institutional water resources: a necessity to understand health risks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safe drinking water in schools is important for students' health. Despite the presence of water treatment systems in rural schools, systematic monitoring and evaluation of drinking water quality are often insufficiently integrated into risk assessment frameworks, potentially compromising student health. In this study, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using drinking water samples from rural primary schools along the Thai-Myanmar border in Kanchanaburi, Thailand, aiming to evaluate the quality of drinking water in terms of physicochemical and bacteriological parameters and assess the health risks to students. A total of 52 drinking water samples were collected for water quality analysis. Among these, approximately 42% (n = 22) of these collected samples did not comply with Thailand's recommended limits of drinking water quality. Among the noncompliant samples, total coliform bacteria were detected in 59% (n = 13), fluoride concentrations exceeded the permissible limit of 0.70 mg/L in 18% (n = 4), and arsenic levels surpassed the recommended limit of 10 µg/L in 9% (n = 2). These contaminants may pose a potential health risk to students. Health risk assessments indicated that, although the majority of hazard index (HI) and cancer risk (CR) values were within acceptable limits (HI < 1; CR between 1 × 10⁻
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.