Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594224›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of drinking water quality and health risk assessment in rural primary schools along the Thai Myanmar border.

Kezang Choda, Sirirat Sangkarak, Pannamas Maneekan, Pattaneeya Prangthip, Suda Ittisupornrat, Numfon Eaktasang, Suthirat Kittipongvises, Jenyuk Lohwacharin, Athit Phetrak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kezang ChodaDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirirat SangkarakDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pannamas ManeekanDepartment of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pattaneeya PrangthipDepartment of Tropical Nutrition and Food Science, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suda IttisupornratClimate Change and Environmental Research Center, Department of Climate Change and Environment, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Numfon EaktasangFaculty of Public Health, Thammasat University (Rangsit Campus), Khlong Luang, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Suthirat KittipongvisesSustainable Environment Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jenyuk LohwacharinDepartment of Environmental and Sustainable Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Athit PhetrakDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. athit.phe@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe drinking water in schools is important for students' health. Despite the presence of water treatment systems in rural schools, systematic monitoring and evaluation of drinking water quality are often insufficiently integrated into risk assessment frameworks, potentially compromising student health. In this study, a cross-sectional survey was conducted using drinking water samples from rural primary schools along the Thai-Myanmar border in Kanchanaburi, Thailand, aiming to evaluate the quality of drinking water in terms of physicochemical and bacteriological parameters and assess the health risks to students. A total of 52 drinking water samples were collected for water quality analysis. Among these, approximately 42% (n = 22) of these collected samples did not comply with Thailand's recommended limits of drinking water quality. Among the noncompliant samples, total coliform bacteria were detected in 59% (n = 13), fluoride concentrations exceeded the permissible limit of 0.70 mg/L in 18% (n = 4), and arsenic levels surpassed the recommended limit of 10 µg/L in 9% (n = 2). These contaminants may pose a potential health risk to students. Health risk assessments indicated that, although the majority of hazard index (HI) and cancer risk (CR) values were within acceptable limits (HI < 1; CR between 1 × 10⁻

Indexed as

Drinking WaterSchoolsWater QualityArsenicCross-Sectional StudiesMyanmarRisk AssessmentRural PopulationThailandWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicDrinking waterFluorideSchool healthThai–Myanmar border

Identifiers

PMID40594224
PMCPMC12214613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.